<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">115</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:32e1b97d-7003-598d-92e7-0ceb44416cc9</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">BRICS Journal of Economics</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">brics-econ</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2712-7702</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2712-7508</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>BRICS Journal of Economics</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/brics-econ.7.e153485</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">153485</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>(J) Labor and Demographic Economics</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Determinants of low fertility in China: does housing affordability matter?</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kalabikhina</surname>
            <given-names>Irina</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">ikalabikhina@yandex.ru</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3958-6630</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Han</surname>
            <given-names>Lingang</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow (Russia)</addr-line>
        <institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Moscow</addr-line>
        <country>Russia</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/010pmpe69</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Shenzhen MSU-BIT University, Shenzhen (China)</addr-line>
        <institution>Shenzhen MSU-BIT University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Shenzhen</addr-line>
        <country>China</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/02q963474</uri>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Irina Kalabikhina (ikalabikhina@yandex.ru)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: Sheresheva M.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>10</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>5</fpage>
      <lpage>20</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/9C734E8A-8147-5DF6-B589-A4B679565327">9C734E8A-8147-5DF6-B589-A4B679565327</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>20</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>18</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Irina Kalabikhina, Lingang Han</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abs tract</label>
        <p>China underwent a demographic transition in the 20<sup>th</sup> century, which led to a decrease in fertility below the level necessary for population replacement. China’s fertility has been below replacement level for a long time, with the total fertility coefficient at 2.1 births per woman. At present, fertility continues to decline despite the abandonment of the population control policy. The reduction in fertility and the postponement of childbirth reflect the fact that younger people are increasingly unwilling to have children. Identifying the factors that influence fertility rates is important for understanding ways to increase fertility. The paper examines the factors affecting the Chinese fertility rate over the period from 2001 to 2021 using econometric models and data from 31 Chinese provinces. The author’s main research interest is to investigate the ways in which housing affordability and other control variables determine the relationship between socio-economic factors and birth rates in China’s provinces. The findings reveal that affordability of housing has a significant negative impact on fertility rates and that home ownership becomes a heavy burden for young people when they consider having children.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>low fertility</kwd>
        <kwd>China</kwd>
        <kwd>determinants of fertility</kwd>
        <kwd>housing affordability</kwd>
        <kwd>fixed effects.</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <custom-meta-group>
        <custom-meta>
          <meta-name>JEL</meta-name>
          <meta-value>J13, J11, R21, R31, C23</meta-value>
        </custom-meta>
      </custom-meta-group>
    </article-meta>
    <notes>
      <sec sec-type="Citation" id="sec1">
        <title>Citation</title>
        <p>Kalabikhina, I., &amp; Han, L. (2026). Determinants of low fertility in China: does housing affordability matter? <italic>BRICS Journal of Economics, 7</italic>(2), 5–20. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.3897/brics-econ.7.e153485">https://doi.org/10.3897/brics-econ.7.e153485</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
    </notes>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="A brief history of fertility trends in China in the 21st century" id="sec2">
      <title>A brief history of fertility trends in China in the 21st century</title>
      <p>D uring the first 22 years of the new millennium, the average number of children born per 1000 women in reproductive age decreased by 29 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). The declining number of women in reproductive age in China, combined with a decreasing fertility rate, has led to a rapid drop in births.</p>
      <fig id="F1">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/brics-econ.7.e153485.figure1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">601B53C5-684B-5B04-8901-BF3AEDB59322</object-id>
        <label>Figure 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Specific fertility rate, China, ‰. <italic>Source</italic>: plotted by the authors based on population.un.org data</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="brics-econ-07-005-g001.jpg" id="oo_1675466.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1675466</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>We have calculated the specific fertility rate for children of different orders of birth to find that, in 2016 and 2017, it increased significantly for the second child and slightly for the third child. This means that the policy of having two children, which was adopted by the government in 2015, contributed to a temporary increase in the willingness of women to have children. (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). Starting in 2017, however, the special fertility rate suddenly began to fall significantly. It must have been the result of several factors, two of which were most important. First, the proportion of young women among women of reproductive age decreased because China had established family planning as a basic national policy in 1982 and strictly enforced it throughout the 1990s. This has led to a decrease in the number of women aged between 25 and 34 years old. The second factor is economic. In 2016, house prices in China began to grow rapidly while wage levels remained largely unchanged, which contributed to a decrease in young people’s willingness to have children (we will discuss this in more detail later in the article).</p>
      <fig id="F2">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/brics-econ.7.e153485.figure2</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">9331F1BA-09F8-5743-B183-2EB9A1AEC173</object-id>
        <label>Figure 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Specific fertility rates for children of different birth orders, China, ‰. <italic>Source</italic>: plotted by the authors based on data from the National Bureau of Statistics of China.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="brics-econ-07-005-g002.jpg" id="oo_1675467.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1675467</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>Many factors determined the sharp decline in the special fertility rate in 2017. The universal two-child policy certainly played a role, but its impact was limited (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chen, 2021</xref>). Research into the causes of low fertility should start with social, cultural, and economic factors, as these may be more significant than national policies that do not address determinants of low birth rates and only provide direct material incentives for having children (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Kalabikhina, 2021</xref>).</p>
      <p>Rural and urban fertility rates differ from each other, so we compared the variations in specific rural and urban fertility rates over the last 20 years (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). We also distinguished between the fertility rates in larger and smaller urban settlements. Large agglomerations had the lowest fertility rate while in rural areas it was the highest.</p>
      <fig id="F3">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/brics-econ.7.e153485.figure3</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">05A1C9DC-8D50-582F-8BE9-A9591A5E0452</object-id>
        <label>Figure 3.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Specific fertility rates in major cities, small cities and villages, China, ‰. <italic>Note</italic>: ‘Major city’ is a larger settlement formed by an agglomeration of non-agricultural industries and non-agricultural population, usually with a permanent population of more than 100,000. ‘Small city’ is an urban settlement with a population between 20,000 and 100,000. ‘Village’ is a rural settlement. <italic>Source</italic>: plotted by the authors based on data from the National Bureau of Statistics of China.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="brics-econ-07-005-g003.jpg" id="oo_1675468.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1675468</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>An interes ting phenomenon that remained unchanged is that specific fertility rates in rural areas and small cities (which are closer to the lifestyle of rural areas) are generally higher than those in mid-sized or major urban areas, meaning that rural residents are more likely to have children compared to urban residents.</p>
      <p>The specific fertility rate exhibits nearly the same trend in regions with different levels of fertility. From 2001 to 2013, fertility rates remained relatively stable. However, after the state relaxed fertility restrictions in 2013 and again in 2016, the specific fertility rates increased. In 2017, the fertility rates in various regions reached their highest levels in nearly two decades (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). This indicates that the policy of lifting population controls can have a short-term impact on increasing fertility rates in both urban and rural areas.</p>
      <p>Along with the decrease in fertility rates, one has to consider the aging of fertility. (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). Over the last 20 years, the main reproductive age group for women has shifted from 20–24 to 25–29. This means that women are delaying having children. At the same time, the fertility rate among women aged 25-29 has been declining in recent years, even though this group continues to lead in terms of their contribution to overall fertility. The years of 2020-2021 were the period of the coronavirus pandemic when all age-specific birth rates decreased. However, we did not observe any recovery of these indicators in subsequent years either. Fertility continued to decline.</p>
      <fig id="F4">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/brics-econ.7.e153485.figure4</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">0911DCA1-5372-54F9-8792-279F9E8DE38E</object-id>
        <label>Figure 4.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Age-specific birth rates, China, ‰. <italic>Source</italic>: plotted by the authors based on population.un.org data</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="brics-econ-07-005-g004.jpg" id="oo_1675469.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1675469</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref> allo ws us to estimate both the level of fertility (the area under the curve of the age-specific fertility distribution) and the actual age-specific contribution to fertility by different age groups of women. From 2021 onwards, there has been a significant decline in the fertility rate. As early as 2011-2015, the majority of children were born to women aged 25-29, instead of 20-24 as was previously the case. Fertility is aging in China, just as it does in countries that went through the first demographic transition and later entered the second one. After the population control policy was abolished, fertility rates among women aged 30 to 39 increased slightly. This is probably because some women made reproductive decisions that they would not have been able to make in the before.</p>
      <p>We are therefore witnessing a growing fertility crisis in China. The removal of restrictions on higher-order births has not halted the decline in birth rates in the country. New measures are needed to encourage fertility and adopt a completely different approach to population policy. This is what is happening in modern China. As global practice shows, it is quite difficult to implement an effective pro-natalist policy in countries with low fertility rates. The decision to have a child depends on many factors. Understanding the determinants of low fertility will make it possible to design more effective pro-natalist policies. In this paper, we examine the determinants of fertility in China using statistical data for the country’s 31 provinces over the past decades. The main hypothesis we are testing is the relationship between low housing affordability and fertility rates in Chinese provinces. A set of control variables has been selected based on previous research on the determinants of fertility rates.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Literature review" id="sec3">
      <title>Literature review</title>
      <sec sec-type="1. Demographic transition and its dynamics in China" id="sec4">
        <title>1. Demographic transition and its dynamics in China</title>
        <p>All countries undergo a demographic transition in which mortality rates typically go down first, followed by fertility rates that fall below the level of replacement because of the rise of individualism in the postmodern era (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Landry, 1934</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Notestein, 1945</xref>). This phenomenon is known as the second demographic transition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Van de Kaa, 1987</xref>).</p>
        <p>According to Bloom et al. (1998) and Mason and Kinugasa (2005), countries that achieved economic prosperity after the Second World War typically went through three phases of demographic change. The first phase was the birth of the Baby Boomer generation, which occurred within 10-20 years after the Second World War. Incomes rising during the period of peace and delayed childbearing brought about an increase in births; together with reduced infant mortality it led to a rapid population growth. The second phase took place during the 1950s and 1960s, following the Baby Boomer generation. The advancement of birth control policies, or “family planning”, and increased education, especially for women, resulted in lower fertility despite rising incomes. The former babies became adults and entered the labour market, forming the workforce. In theory, there were more people in society capable of creating wealth, leading to faster <abbrev xlink:title="gross domestic product">GDP</abbrev> growth.</p>
        <p>The third phase came 50-60 years after the birth of the baby boomer generation. Birth control policies and various other social and economic factors caused the younger generation to prefer smaller families, which led to further decline in the birth rate. As the first wave of Baby Boomers began to retire, the number of retirees exceeded the number of newly-born babies, and the proportion of the population in work decreased, reducing the supply of investment and further slowing down economic growth. That is, econo mic recovery and rising income of workers led to increased fertility. However, the implementation of birth control measures led to a decrease in fertility, directly causing a decrease in proportion of the labour force. As a result, fertility continued to decline, and an aging society emerged.</p>
        <p>China’s demographic development is consistent with the theories of David and Mason (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Jiang &amp; Liu, 2016</xref>). After the founding of New China in 1949, economic boom led to rapid increase in the country’s birth rate. However, owing to family planning policies and the onset of demographic transition, people’s desire to have children noticeably diminished and China entered the era of an ageing society, with the demographic dividend gradually fading away (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Liu, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Kalabikhina &amp; Kazbekova; 2022</xref>). According to the national census (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Xue, 2021</xref>), China’s fertility rate continued to decline, with the total fertility rate falling to 1.18 in 2022 (World Bank data). This level was recognised as very low (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Billari, 2005</xref>). China entered the period of the second demographic transition. The latest cens us data also show that the number and proportion of people in the working age group has decreased significantly, and the aging process has accelerated.</p>
        <p>In response to the trends of ultra-low fertility and ageing of population, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lutz et al.(2006)</xref> proposed a low fertility trap theory. It provides an important perspective for research on low fertility and explains the three mechanisms that shape demography, sociology, and economics in the context of ultra-low fertility. In other words, once a country’s total fertility rate falls below 1.5, it becomes difficult to increase the fertility rate again. From a demographic perspective, low fertility rates lead to a decrease in the number of children, which in turn reduces the number of women of reproductive age, creating a vicious cycle. This will trigger significant changes in the overall population structure, turning the country into an ageing society. From a sociological perspective, Lutz et al. argue that individuals’ fertility preferences are influenced by actual fertility rates. If younger generations grow up in environments with fewer children per family, their ideal family size will also shrink under the influence of interpersonal interactions, thereby reducing the number of children they choose to have. Economic mechanisms show that the decline in fertility rates coupled with accelerated ageing presents an unfavourable outlook for economic development and social security. Younger generations may feel increased pressure and have lower expectations for future income, so they decide to have fewer children as a result. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Wu Fan and Li Jianmin (2022)</xref> note that from a policy perspective, at least two strategies should be implemented to prevent a fertility crisis. These include eliminating the fertility deficit and encouraging people to have more children. We suggest that it is possible to create a better environment for people to have the children they want. It is also possible to change their reproductive attitudes towards increasing the number of children. The first strategy appears to be easier to implement, as it reduces the gap between the desired and actual number of children (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Arkhangelsky, 2006</xref>). For a demographic policy to be effective, it is necessary to identify and mitigate factors that negatively affect fertility, as well as the ability to reach the desired fertility level.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="2. Factors of fertility reduction" id="sec5">
        <title>2. Factors of fertility reduction</title>
        <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Gary Becker’s work (1960)</xref> was among the earliest to explore the economic aspects of human reproductive decisions. He saw children as a durable good, assuming that when parents decide to have a child, they are choosing between a child and other goods, while acting within a budget and focusing on a specific utility function determined by factors such as culture, religion, and age. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Leibenstein (1981)</xref> conducted a more comprehensive and systematic analysis of childbearing decisions in families. He considered the birth of a child and a number of subsequent events as economic implications for parents: as parents incur certain costs when having a child, these costs should be balanced against their effects. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Li et al. (2009)</xref> conducted a study on women’s reproductive behaviour and found that when couples or women of reproductive age have their first child, it is mainly to satisfy their spiritual needs. And when they need to have a second child or more children, the cost of bringing up a child becomes a factor in making such a decision. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Liang et al. (2022)</xref> also calculated the cost of raising children. In today’s China, the average cost for a young couple to raise a child until the age of 18 is 485,000 RMB, according to statistics from relevant institutions. This amount continues to increase, with the national average annual cost now standing at 26,944 RMB per year (equivalent to 485,000 over 18 years).</p>
        <p>Therefore, parents’ willingness to have children is influenced by the balance between the benefits and costs associated with having children. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chen Jiaju and Zhai Zhenwu (2016)</xref>, political, socio-economic, and personal factors all influence parents’ decision to have children.</p>
        <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chen Wei’s study (2021)</xref> confirms the positive impact of the repeal of the population control policy on people’s desire to have children. The two-child policy has led not only to an increase in the number of second births, but also to a significant rise in the number of third and subsequent births. Compared to 2013, when the one-child policy was ended, the increase was significant. However, the effect of the policy is not permanent and there are other factors that influence people’s willingness to have children. For example, socio-cultural and economic factors may be more important than population policies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Lieming et al, 2022</xref>). These two groups of factors determine reproductive behaviour.</p>
        <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Yingchun and Zhenzhen (2018)</xref> analysed women’s willingness to have children from the perspective of personal development and found that after the population policy reform, women have struggled to balance work and family. The contradiction between work and child-rearing has become more apparent. The family pattern (the degree of gender equality in the household) has become the main factor influencing women’s willingness to have children.</p>
        <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Xue (2021)</xref> confirms that the female labour force participation rate negatively affects the fertility rate in China. In other words, the higher a woman’s participation in the labour force, the lower the fertility rate will be. Today, in the absence of gender equality within the family where only women are responsible for bringing up children, fertility rates will decline. Since the influence of social and cultural factors may be stronger than that of economic rationality, even if women’s wages are higher or the labour force participation rate is higher, women usually have to do more housework and also care for children and the elderly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Kalabikhina, 2021</xref>). Moreover, given the gender discrimination in the workplace, women are forced to choose between having children and working, which also makes women more reluctant to have children.). Therefore, with gender discrimination in the home and in the workplace, there is a negative correlation between the level of labour force participation and decisions to have children, especially higher-order children, second- and third-born.</p>
        <p>Some researchers have also studied the influence of education level on reproductive behaviour. According to Becker’s theory and the findings of modern researchers, educated women have a higher opportunity cost of having a child. Therefore, they refuse to have children, especially of higher order, and/or delay marriage and childbirth for economic reasons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Zhuravleva and Gavrilov, 2017</xref>). On the other hand, a highly educated women has a high chance of meeting a highly educated man. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Oppenheimer, 1994</xref>) This increases the likelihood of having children immediately after graduation, because, first, a partner’s education provides a high income, and second, women with a higher education have more power in the household and are able to divide household responsibilities equally. This reduces the burden of domestic work on women. There is no consensus in the empirical literature on the relationship between female education and fertility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Kim, 2023</xref>).</p>
        <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Yang (2022)</xref> analysed the impact of urbanisation on fertility from the perspective of social development. He believes that improving urban conditions will change young people’s ideas about fertility. In the past, large rural households believed that the more children a family had, the happier they were, but now, more and more people favour having fewer children, so that parents can devote more time and energy to each child and ensure that their human capital is greater.</p>
        <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Zhenzhen (2021)</xref> analysed the factors that influence fertility from an economic perspective. She found that the current high housing prices affect young people’s desire to have children, increasing pressure on them and making it difficult to afford having children. She also analysed the economic development factors that affect young people. In more economically developed areas, young people have more job opportunities and career prospects, which contributes to their desire to have children. However, the pace of life in these areas is more intense, leaving young people with fewer resources to support children.</p>
        <p>In addition to socio-economic and political factors, researchers also examine the demographic aspect. Among the determinants of fertility explored by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">V. N. Arkhangelsky (2006)</xref>, we would like to highlight the influence of the need for children. If data are available, it would be most promising to take a separate look at people with more or less positive attitudes toward having children. Other demographic factors, such as the shift in the age of first births and the gender imbalances in the marriage market, may also have an impact on fertility.</p>
        <p>Building on the work of previous researchers and using available regional data from all provinces of China, this paper examines the following socio-economic factors: the number of years of education per person, the female labour force participation rate, the housing price-to-average income ratio (which measures the affordability of housing), the level of urbanization, and the gross regional product per person. We pay special attention to housing affordability because housing prices have increased significantly in China in recent years. The average price per square meter in 2001 was RMB 2,000, but by 2022 it had risen to RMB 9,700. This is a five-fold increase compared to 20 years ago, and the average annual growth rate is 8.5%. Housing prices continue to rise in some major cities, especially those where young people live. For example, in Shenzhen, the average housing price in 2001 was 5,531 RMB per square metre, while the average housing price in 2022 was 54,368 RMB per square metre, a ten-fold increase!</p>
        <p>Rising housing prices increase pressure on young people, affecting the willingness of women of reproductive age to have children. In our study, we not only study housing prices, but also look specifically at affordability of housing: the ratio between province-level house prices and average income. We do not have regional data on childbearing needs, nor do we model population policy factors, including at the provincial level. Their effects will be captured using a fixed effects model: we believe that this model will give the best results in estimating the determinants of fertility based on province-level data. Our focus is on socioeconomic factors that influence fertility.</p>
        <p>At present, research on fertility has mainly concentrated on the study of variations in fertility, but very few quantitative studies explored the factors that influenced fertility in different provinces. This paper uses regional panel data to explore the reasons behind the low birth rates in China and to quantitatively analyze the selected factors.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Data and methods" id="sec6">
      <title>Data and methods</title>
      <p>Y oung women of reproductive age are the main group for childbearing. However, according to the China Population Census Yearbook, the average age at first marriage for women had increased to 23.28 years by the year 2000. For men, it was 25. By 2020, the average age at first marriage for men rose to 29.38 years, and for women to 27.95 years. This increase in the average age of first marriage reflects the decline in the number of young women who get married, which leads to a delay in having children. Therefore, if we use the fertility rate for the younger age groups as the dependent variable, we will get distorted data.</p>
      <p>As we have pointed out, the two-child policy resulted in a short-term increase in fertility rates, followed by rapid decline in the fertility rate for the second child (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). Thus, economic and social factors affect not only young people, but also older women of childbearing age. We therefore consider the fertility rate - the number of children born per 1,000 women in the reproductive age group - to be the dependent variable. This indicator depends on the age distribution of women of childbearing age, and, in this sense, it is less reliable than the total fertility rate. However, China does not publish the total fertility rate annually, and it is even more challenging to make estimates for individual provinces. So we have decided to use the specific fertility rate as the best available indicator for this study, which covers the period from 2001 to 2022.</p>
      <p>Based on available statistics, we selected five indicators as regressors: years of schooling per capita, female labour force participation rate, urbanization rate, housing price-to-income ratio, and regional gross domestic product (<abbrev xlink:title="gross domestic product">GDP</abbrev>) of Chinese provinces. We used these indicators to develop a panel model and examine their effect on the specific fertility rate from 2001 to 2021 (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>).</p>
      <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Variables modelling fertility factors for China’s provinces</p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Variable type</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Variable</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Source</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Description of variable</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Designation</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Expected sign (hypothesis)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <italic>Dependent variable</italic>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <italic>Specific fertility rate, ‰</italic>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <italic>National Bureau of Statistics and Provincial Bureau of Statistics</italic>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <italic>Number of births divided by the number of women of reproductive age (15-49 years)</italic>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <italic>birth</italic>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="5" colspan="1">Independent variables</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Years of schooling per capita, years</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">National Bureau of Statistics</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Average years of schooling per capita for the province</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">educate</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Female labour participation rate, %</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Provincial Bureau of Statistics / Local statistical news documents</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Ratio of female labour force participation to the total number of women aged 15-64 years in the province</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">labour</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Level of urbanisation, %</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">National Bureau of Statistics</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Population size of the city divided by population size of the province</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">urbanisation</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Housing price-to-income ratio</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">National Bureau of Statistics</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Average housing price per square metre divided by average disposable income per capita per month in the province</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">ratio</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">GRP per capita (thousand RMB)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">National Bureau of Statistics</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">GRP per capita (an indicator of the province’s level of economic development)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">GRP</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">+</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p><italic>Source</italic>: compiled by the authors</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Findings from modelling of determinants of fertility rates" id="sec7">
      <title>Findings from modelling of determinants of fertility rates</title>
      <p>Let us consider the findings of econometric modelling for fertility rate determination based on data for China’s provinces from 2001 to 2021.</p>
      <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Findings from model estimation. Dependent variable: births per 1,000 women aged 15-49 (specific fertility rate)</p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>(1)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>(2)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>(3)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>(4)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>(pooled OLS)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>(ind <abbrev xlink:title="fixed effects model">FE</abbrev>)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>(two <abbrev xlink:title="fixed effects model">FE</abbrev>)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>(RE)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">educate</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-2.2142* (1.1573)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-4.5503*** (0.9915)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-1.0895 (1.3158)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-4.5659*** (1.0001)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">labour</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-0.5616** (0.2651)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-0.1690 (0.3448)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-3.7298* (1.9703)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-0.3386 (0.2878)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">urbanisation</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-0.5359*** (0.1260)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-0.0605 (0.1484)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.2903** (0.1413)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-0.1317 (0.1173)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">ratio</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1122 (0.8018)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-2.0700*** (0.4895)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-0.8529* (0.5134)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-2.0943*** (0.4926)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">GRP</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1527*** (0.0568)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1020*** (0.0325)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1950*** (0.0460)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1081*** (0.0311)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">constant</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">122.1442*** (19.2980)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">116.0780*** (22.2349)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">---------------------</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-----------------------</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">------------------</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">--------------------</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">---------------------</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Observations</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">651</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">651</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">651</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">651</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">R^2</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.4837</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1217</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1597</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1523</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Adjusted R2</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.4797</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0717</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0820</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1457</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">F Statistic</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">120.8620***</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">17.0354***</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">22.6125***</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">115.8689***</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn>
            <p><italic>Note</italic>: Robust standard errors are given in parentheses below the respective coefficient estimates. ***p&lt;0,01, **p&lt;0,05, *p&lt;0,1. <italic>Source</italic>: Compiled by the authors based on data from the National Bureau of Statistics of China, Provincial Bureau of Statistics, shujujidi.com. Among these, the pooled model posits that there are no differences between provinces and that they all follow the same pattern.</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>The fixed-effect model assumes that provinces share some commonalities, such as identical slope terms, but also have differences, such as different intercept terms. For example, each province may have its own unique culture, and the cultures of different provinces may not change over time or may change only slightly. The two-way fixed effects model also controls for the common effects of time trends on all provinces, such as the effects of economic cycles and policy changes on all provinces.</p>
      <p>The random-effects model, on the other hand, assumes that the characteristics of provinces are random.</p>
      <p>The economic development of a province has a positive impact on fertility in all specifications, while housing affordability has a negative effect in most specifications, including the best one. After the linear regression test, F-tests and Hausman tests, the fixed effects model (<abbrev xlink:title="fixed effects model">FE</abbrev>) is the most appropriate model, which usually holds true at the regional level of analysis. It shows a positive effect of economic development and urbanisation, and a negative effect of housing affordability and female employment rate, taking into account specific factors at the provincial level.</p>
      <p>The findings produced by this model specification are as follows: other things being equal, (1) for every 1 percentage point increase in the female labour force participation rate, the specific fertility rate falls on average by 3.73 per mille; (2) for every 1 percentage point increase in the level of urbanisation, the specific fertility rate rises on average by 0.29 per mille; (3) For every increase in the housing price-to-income ratio by 1, the specific fertility rate falls by 0.85 per mille; 4) for every 1,000 RMB increase in GRP per capita, the specific fertility rate increases by 0.20 per mille.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec8">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>The housing price-to-income ratio in each province has a significant negative effect on the fertility rate. This is because buying a home has become a heavy burden for young people as they decide whether to have children or not. For example, given that the down payment is 30%, the mortgage loan amount is 70% of the property value and the mortgage interest rate is 4.1%, the loan will be paid back over 20 years.</p>
      <p>Based on an average of RMB 9,000 per square meter in 2021, the final total repayment amount of a 100-square-meter residence is RMB 989,519.4, and the interest is RMB359,519.4. A monthly repayment of RMB 4,123 is required. The average wage is now RMB 7,700. In other words, the monthly mortgage payment should be 50% or more of the wage. In addition to the mortgage, young people have to pay for electricity, food, transport, and other expenses. Increases in these costs add to the economic pressure. As a result, young families cannot afford the expected additional costs of having children in the future.</p>
      <p>According to the model’s findings, an increase in <abbrev xlink:title="gross domestic product">GDP</abbrev> per capita has a positive effect on the fertility rate. In areas with a highly developed economy, young people have better job and career prospects. They are more likely to earn higher wages and have better social security benefits, which can lead to an increase in fertility rates. Consequently, an increase in <abbrev xlink:title="gross domestic product">GDP</abbrev> per capita can lead to higher fertility rates.</p>
      <p>In the model specification that we have chosen, urbanisation has a positive impact on fertility rates. This finding contradicts the traditional understanding of the fertility determinants, as well as the demographic statistics presented earlier. The conventional hypothesis is that increased urbanisation leads to a decrease in the fertility rate. We can offer the following explanations for this effect. First, the model collects data from 31 provinces in China from 2001 to 2021. The number of provinces observed is large (31), and the time span (21) is small, which means that the model contains short panel data and may be prone to errors. We can see that the results are unstable. Second, increased urbanisation may be related to regional economic development. Improved regional economic performance promotes urban development, leading to better job opportunities in highly urbanised areas. This, in turn, will result in better social welfare and healthcare in these areas. This effect overrides the impact of relatively lower urban fertility rates. Third, during the period of active urbanisation that China experienced in the decades under review, traditional reproductive attitudes among young people moving from the countryside into the cities may persist for a while. Widespread communication technology allows young people to communicate with their elders in the country at any time, which means that the influence of the older generation’s attitudes on young people will not disappear quickly. During traditional Chinese festivals, young people return to their hometowns, and the older generations use this period to encourage their sons and daughters to start families and have children. This hypothesis can only be tested using qualitative sociological methods.</p>
      <p>A limitation of the model is that it is not possible to accurately estimate its endogeneity. Therefore, we can only argue for the existence of a possible relationship between the fertility rate and the selected fertility determinants, rather than for the direct effect of these factors on fertility.</p>
      <p>In general, it has been conclusively proven that the fertility crisis will lead to population decline, labour shortages and higher labour costs in the future, which will affect the sustainability of economic development. The ageing of the population will increase, and young people will have to care for both their children and the elderly parents, which may further reduce fertility. The gradual increase in the elderly population will put greater pressure on social security, pension and health insurance systems. Demographic policies can only slightly alleviate the fertility crisis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Wu Fan, Li Jianmin, 2022</xref>). To design effective policies that could stem the decline in fertility rates, it is essential to understand the determinants of low fertility. In particular, we suggest focusing on two policy directions in China’s transition from fertility restriction to a pro-natalist population policy rather than removing past restrictions. Although the population policy has become more relaxed, the fertility rate has not significantly increased and in the long term it is likely to decrease. China needs a reproductive policy based on respect for reproductive attitudes of women and the family. The government has lifted restrictions on childbearing, reaffirming the family’s right to reproduce and initiating a new pro-natal policy aimed at boosting population growth. Influencing reproductive attitudes is a challenge. But improving the conditions under which existing reproductive attitudes are realised is the first priority of population policy. Reproductive attitudes in many countries often correspond to higher than actual fertility levels, which means that the conditions for having children within individual families do not allow these attitudes to become reality. Here the population policy can help through working with economic resources — material resources and time — through striking a balance between family and work for both mothers and fathers.</p>
      <p>On e pillar of such policy is the pro-natalism housing market regulation for young families, which is a material policy measure. The second pillar is a labor market that is friendly to mothers and fathers, and it is non-material in nature.</p>
      <p>In particular, as rising housing prices, which mean decreased housing affordability, have a negative impact on fertility rates, the government could implement preferential pricing policies or family mortgages for families with young children. These programmes could be restricted to single homeowners in order to discourage speculative activity in the housing market.</p>
      <p>It is also important to change employers’ and employees’ gender stereotypes that only women should take care of children. Governments should rigorously enforce labour legislation to protect the rights of women in the workplace. The hiring practices of companies should be strictly regulated to reduce gender discrimination in the hiring process, promote equal employment of women, protect women’s reproductive rights, and prevent discrimination and other negative consequences on the part of company managers when women become mothers. Evidence from a number of countries, including China, shows that improved gender equality in caring for children and the elderly and reduced discriminatory stereotypes in the labour market can increase the likelihood of birth of second and higher-order children (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Geng et al, 2024</xref>).</p>
      <p>Th e third pillar is reducing the undesirable flows of talent. Specifically, regions (especially those that are economically underdeveloped) should implement appropriate talent recruitment plans and strictly enforce them. This can reduce the excessive migration of young people to major cities. The following effects can be achieved: first, young people benefit from substantial subsidies under such plans; some of them may even receive housing from the government, which will alleviate economic pressure on their families. Second, the reduced number of young people entering major cities should ease the competitive pressure on young people in those cities. Third, this helps to enhance the local talent pool and the future economic development potential. This fosters a positive cycle that is most beneficial for the region.</p>
      <p>The government can encourage companies to introduce flexible and remote work arrangements for pregnant women, mothers and fathers to improve parents’ work-life balance. It would also be useful to provide fathers with non-transferrable paternity leave.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Arkhangelsky, V. N. (2006). <italic>Factors Affecting Birth Rates</italic>. TEIS.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In <italic>Demographic and economic change in developed countries</italic> (pp. 209-240). Columbia University Press.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Billari, F. C. (2005). Europe and its fertility: from low to lowest low. <italic>National Institute Economic Review</italic>, (<italic>194)</italic>, 56-73. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1177/0027950105061496" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1177/0027950105061496</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Bloom, D. E., &amp; Williamson, J. G. (1998). Demographic transitions and economic miracles in emerging Asia. <italic>The World Bank Economic Review</italic>, 12(3), 419-455. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/wber/12.3.419" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/12.3.419</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Chen, W. (2021). China’s low fertility rate and three-child policy. Analysis based on data from the Seventh National Census. <italic>Population &amp; Economics</italic>, 5(11), 25-35. (in Chinese).</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Geng, Y., Jiang, X., &amp; Yan, Y. (2024). Toward sustainability: mechanism between work–family balance and fertility intention with decent work as the mediating role. <italic>Humanit Soc Sci Commun</italic>, (<bold>11)</bold>, 1279. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1057/s41599-024-03786-9">https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03786-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Jiaju, C. &amp; Zhenwu, Z. (2016). Analysis of the history and influence mechanism of changes in international fertility levels since the 20th century. <italic>Chinese Population Science</italic>, (02), 12-25.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Jiang, Q., &amp; Liu, Y. (2016). Low fertility and concurrent birth control policy in China. <italic>The History of the Family</italic>, 21(4), 551-577. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/1081602X.2016.1213179" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2016.1213179</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Kalabikhina, I. E. (2021). How will we know when gender equality is coming? <italic>Women in Russian society</italic>, (2), 3-16.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Kalabikhina, I. E., &amp; Kazbekova, Z. G. (2022). The impact of the first demographic dividend on economic growth, taking into account human capital. <italic>Journal of the New Economic Association</italic>, 3(55), 81–100. <ext-link xlink:href="10.31737/2221-2264-2022-55-3-5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-55-3-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Kim, J. (2023). <italic>Fema le education and its impact on fertility</italic>. IZA World of Labor. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="10.15185/izawol.228.v2">https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.228.v2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Landry, A. (1934). <italic>La r évolution démographique. Études et essais sur les problèmes de la population</italic>. INED.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Leibinstein, H. (1981). Econ omic Decision Theory and Fertility Behavior. <italic>Population and Development Review</italic>, 7(3), 381-400.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Lieming, F., Shatalova, E., &amp; Kalabikhina, I. E. (2022). Determinants of regional fertility in China during the first years of reaching below-replacement fertility. <italic>BRICS Journal of Economics</italic>, <italic>3</italic>(3), 101-127. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.3897/brics-econ.3.e83259">https://doi.org/10.3897/brics-econ.3.e83259</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Li Y., Zheng Z., &amp; Liao S. (2009). Research on the cost and benefits of childbirth at low fertility levels. A survey from Jiangsu Province. <italic>Chinese Population Science</italic>, 2009(02), 93-102.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Liang J., Ren Z., Huang W., &amp; He Y. (2022). <italic>China Fertility Report</italic>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Liu, R. (2021). New China’s Population Policy Development. <italic>Proceedings of the 8th Public Policy Think Tank Forum and International Seminar on Governance Modernization in East Asia</italic> (pp.91-96) (in Chinese) <ext-link xlink:href="10.26914/c.cnkihy.2021.054968" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.26914/c.cnkihy.2021.054968</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Lutz W., Skirbekk V., &amp; Testa M. R. (2006). The Low-fertility Trap Hypothesis: Forces That May Lead to Further Postponement and Fewer Births in Europe. <italic>Vienna Yearbook of Population Research</italic>, 167-192.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Mason, A., &amp; Kinugasa, T. (2008). East Asian economic development: two demographic dividends. <italic>Journal of Asian economics</italic>, <italic>19</italic>(5-6), 389-399. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.asieco.2008.09.006" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2008.09.006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Notestein, F. W. (1945). Population–The Long View. In <italic>Food for the World</italic>, ed. Theodore W. Schultz. University of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Oppenheimer, V. K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. <italic>Population and development review</italic>, 20(2), 293-342.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. <italic>Population Bulletin</italic>, 42(1), 1-59.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Wu, F., &amp; Li J. (2022). Low fertility rate, low willingness to give birth and fertility deficit. Journal of Shanxi Normal University (Social Science Edition), 49(1), 61-68. <ext-link xlink:href="10.16207/j.cnki.1001-5957.20211211.004" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.16207/j.cnki.1001-5957.20211211.004</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Xue, J. (2021). <italic>Press conference on the main Results of the Seventh National Census</italic>. The Information Bureau of the State Council of China.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Yang, L. C. (2022). <italic>Statistical study of the causes of the ultra-low birth rate in China</italic> (in Chinese). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.shehui.pku.edu.cn/upload/editor/file/20250509/20250509104622_7692.pdf">http://www.shehui.pku.edu.cn/upload/editor/file/20250509/20250509104622_7692.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Yingchun, J., &amp; Zhenzhen, Z. (2018). China’s low fertility rate from the perspective of gender and development. <italic>Social Sciences in China</italic>, 41(04),169-184.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Zhenzhen, Z. (2021). Multiple drivers of reproductive transformation: Looking at China from Asia. <italic>Chinese Social Sciences</italic>, (3). <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.cssn.cn/dkzgxp/zgxp_zgshkx/2021nd3q/202208/t20220822_5479776.shtml" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.cssn.cn/dkzgxp/zgxp_zgshkx/2021nd3q/202208/t20220822_5479776.shtml</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Zhuravleva T. L., &amp; Gavrilova I. A. (2017). Analysis of fertility determinants in Russia: What do RLMS data say? <italic>HSE Economic Journal</italic>, 21(1), 145–187.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
