Research Article |
Corresponding author: Nikolay Nenovsky ( nenovsky@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Marina Sheresheva
© 2024 Nikolay Nenovsky, Gildas Bondi.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Nenovsky N, Bondi G (2024) A proposal for a common currency based on resources of the Alliance of Sahel States. Theoretical and practical issues. BRICS Journal of Economics 5(3): 107-124. https://doi.org/10.3897/brics-econ.5.e133581
|
On 6 July 2024 in Niamey, the leaders of Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger signed the constitutive act of the Confederation of Sahel States, at the same time confirming the departure of these three countries from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). The new Confederation of the Sahel States has decided, among other things, to set up an investment bank and a stabilisation fund. It is therefore plausible that the confederation will soon adopt a common currency. This issue is of utmost importance for many countries so it is worthwhile to see how the proposed new currency will be guaranteed by the natural resources of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES). The aim of this article is to examine the theoretical foundations and practical aspects underlying the creation of a common currency based on natural resources within the AES.
6 июля 2024 года в Ниамее лидеры Мали, Буркина-Фасо и Нигера подписали учредительный акт Конфедерации государств Сахеля, одновременно подтвердив выход этих трех стран из Экономического сообщества западноафриканских государств (ЭКОВАС). Новая Конфедерация сахельских государств решила, в частности, создать инвестиционный банк и стабилизационный фонд. Поэтому вполне вероятно, что в скором времени конфедерация примет общую валюту. С научной точки зрения было бы интересно посмотреть, как эта новая валюта будет обеспечена природными ресурсами Альянса сахельских государств (AES). Цель данной статьи — рассмотреть теоретические и практические аспекты создания общей валюты на основе природных ресурсов в рамках АЕС.
Alliance of Sahel States (AES), common currency, natural and strategic resources-based currency, Africa
Альянс сахельских государств (AES), общая валюта, валюта, основанная на природных и стратегических ресурсах, Африка.
The idea of launching a resource currency, i.e. giving legal status to a certain basket of strategic commodities expressed in physical quantities, against which the currency can be issued, is becoming more and more popular not only within the BRICS, but also in Africa, specifically in the countries of the Sahel Alliance (Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso). It is part of the general trend towards de-dollarisation of international monetary relations and the desire to free themselves from the domination of the dollar and the CFA franc that is considered a colonial relic (see
Instability of the international monetary system based on pyramids of fiat and debt currencies, and even more so on dominant national currencies (principally USD and EURO, but also CNF, JPY and CYN) has strong asymmetric effects whereby resources are redirected from poor countries to the rich that have reserve currencies. Economic imbalances are aggravated by increasing geopolitical fragmentation and formation of geopolitical blocs, various sanctions and confiscations of foreign reserves, and rising national and regional nationalistic movements. Exacerbated problems of food sovereignty and competition for strategic resources necessary to make ecological and digital transition lead to resource wars, the outcomes of which may determine the survival of entire nations and regions. In the face of these two major shocks — geopolitical and resource-related — and growing general insecurity, the construction of an international currency based on material values including resources and raw materials is emerging as a key solution.
The idea of a commodity-based currency has a long history. It has generally been supported by leading monetary economists of various ideological persuasions
Despite the recent numerous declarations, technical preparations and concrete plans to launch a common resource currency, to our knowledge, no practical measures have been undertaken. Supporters of the commodity currency believe that the main obstacles are either political, i.e. opposition from interest groups and lobbies, or financial, namely, the high costs of technically maintaining the system.
In this paper, we show how a resource currency model works, using the Sahel countries as an example. The countries of the Sahel Alliance (AES) are small, open economies, heavily dependent on terms of trade; they produce and export a limited set of products, which are nonetheless strategic in many respects. They currently find themselves in a complex geopolitical context where they have to strike a balance between warring political, military, economic and monetary blocs. The paper presents the main theoretical, organisational and technical elements of the model and outlines a resource currency option for the AES countries. This model is only a first approximation of what could be actually implemented and our proposal requires considerable technical, legal and communication work before the project can be launched. The political and geopolitical conditions for its implementation are not analysed in this document.
In our opinion, an effective institutional solution for the countries of the AES (and subsequently for Africa) will be to establish a two-tier monetary system, i.e.: (i) to introduce a regional currency based on a basket of certain physical strategic resources and (ii) to issue national currencies of the countries participating in the alliance that will be related, fixed or pegged to the regional currency. In this way, the stability of trade and payments between the countries in the AES and price stability at the regional and national levels will be guaranteed
The common currency will be based on a basket of strategic goods vital to the region. This basket will have the status of legal tender and the goods it contains will become “monetary, currency goods”
Full coverage of the regional currency in physical basket quantities will be maintained at all times. The new system can be defined as a commodity currency board
Simplified balance sheet of the regional commodities bank (commodity currency board)
Assets (in physical amounts) | Liabilities (millions of SHL) |
Gold (50%) Warehouse 1 Warehouse 2 Warehouse 3 Warehouse 4 Total gold Lithium (12.5%) Warehouse 1 Warehouse 2 Warehouse 3 Warehouse 4 Total lithium Uranium (12.5%) Warehouse 1 Warehouse 2 Warehouse 3 Warehouse 4 Total uranium Cotton (12.5%) Warehouse 1 Warehouse 2 Warehouse 3 Warehouse 4 Total cotton Maize (12.5%) Warehouse 1 Warehouse 2 Warehouse 3 Warehouse 4 Total maize | Bank notes Deposits (reserves) of national central banks Deposits by general government and other national institutions Deposits by supranational and regional institutions Capital |
Grand Total | Grand Total |
On the liability side of the regional bank, in addition to the issued resource baked banknotes, the three national central banks will keep their reserves (statutory and free), similar to the modern practice of commercial banks holding their reserves (required and free) in the central bank. National governments and leading national, regional and supranational and foreign institutions will also be able to open different accounts in the resource currency.
The bank’s balance sheet will be transparent and published either periodically, e.g. every week, or on an ongoing basis. The aim is to ensure confidence in the currency by monitoring its coverage: the movement of assets will give signals both to the bank and to the users and producers of money. In addition to the fixed price at which the basket will be bought and sold by the common bank (these will be determined by the resource experts), the basket will also have a market price. It will be formed by the movement of individual prices of its components. At any time, arbitrage will allow the basket to be bought or sold according to the difference between the market price and the set price. The bank will only sell or buy the basket in its entirety; for example, if the arbitrageurs wish to sell the basket to the bank, they will have to procure the goods in the required proportion.
To finance the system, there will be a small margin (1-5%) between the buying and selling rates of the basket. With this small margin, the bank will finance its operations, insurance of the goods, their periodic replacement (if necessary) and management of the storage of the goods. The warehouses will need to be optimally located in terms of raw material production and necessary transport. The aim is to minimise transport costs, although a large proportion of transactions will be carried out through bookkeeping entries. It can be assumed that physical movement to and from the warehouses will not be significant, except in periods of volatility.
Assuming that monetary, or currency, goods are structurally determined by the economies of the zone, price controls over the basket of monetary goods should stabilise the general price level in the countries of the zone. The stability, or low fluctuation, of prices is complemented by the control of sharp falls in aggregate demand and the emergence of unemployment due to the marketable nature of the monetary anchor (the basket). This is because the items in the basket are directly included in the consumption and production process and export and other operations. In this sense, monetary goods are very quickly transformed into ordinary goods, and conversely, ordinary goods into monetary goods. In this way, the price target is combined with a direct effect on overall supply and demand, by influencing the supply and demand of monetary goods.
The new currency will serve the trade between countries by regulating the final clearing balances, i.e. the purpose of the settlement. It will be in demand not only as a means of payment within the AES zone but also outside it because it will guarantee access to important and irreplaceable resources. Countries in the zone will be able to import the industrial and other goods they need. it will also serve as a means of saving and investment, because the interest rate formed will be very close to the real interest rate (equilibrium rate). The common currency will be used to make large payments, and any banknotes issued will be in large denominations
Assuming that the rules of the system are observed, we can expect that the sustained external demand will keep these currencies’ exchange rates stable against the dollar and, moreover, that they will appreciate against other fiat currencies.
Each country in the zone should retain its central bank and its currency, not only as a symbol of sovereignty and national identity, but also as a means of reacting to specific national problems and financing national projects. The experience of contemporary monetary unions (euro zone, CFA zone) has shown the limits imposed by complete elimination of the national currencies. Taking account of this experience, the national banks of the AES will be able to issue national currencies, provided that they are backed at least 50% by common resource money and optionally by other precious metals, as recommended by the rule (see table 2). The exchange rates of these currencies will be determined in relation to the common resource currency; it is advisable to synchronise them between the participants.
Assets | Liabilities |
Raw materials reserves (min 50%) Banknotes in SHL (cash) SHL reserves (deposits and current accounts with the Regional Bank) Other precious metal options Total Claims on the State Securities (treasury bills and others) Advances to the government Total Due from banks Securities Refinancing Total | National notes and coins Deposits (reserves) of commercial banks and other financial institutions National government current accounts and deposits Capital |
Grand Total | Grand Total |
In addition to the national banknotes and coins, the liabilities on the balance sheets of the national central banks will also include accounts of the national commercial banks and financial institutions. These will help maintain the required reserves and store the free funds. The national governments will also keep their funds in their countries’ national banks and have the right to hold part of their funds in regional banks (see previous balance sheet). Their accounts, mainly of the Ministries of Finance, will reflect the dynamics of budget receipts: tax and other internal receipts, the external ones, such as transfers, aid and loans, and budget payments including salaries and debt service. It means that the national bank will be the main treasurer of the government, with the possibility to open accounts in the regional banks, too. The government will thus have more opportunities to optimize the management of its funds.
Within the above-mentioned limit of 50%, the national banks will be able to purchase the national debt, make advances to the government, refinance banks and perform other functions. The national currency will be used mainly for domestic circulation and may exist in small denominations. The regional currency in large denominations will circulate alongside national currency, and this co-circulation will provide competitive pressure and checking functions. In order to stabilise the demand for both types of currency, the payment of taxes and salaries in the public sector to a certain extent could be settled in common or national currency. Exporters and producers of strategic goods, for example, could pay their taxes in common currency.
Total public debt as % of GDP | Public debt servicing as % of revenue (excluding grants) | GDP (US$ billions) (2023) | Population (2023) | Inflation in % p.a. (2023) | |
Burkina Faso | 61.3 | 46.9 | 20,32 | 23 251 485 | 0,7 |
Mali | 55.8 | 47.7 | 20,9 | 23 293 698 | 2,1 |
Niger | 57.6 | 71.3 | 16,82 | 27 202 843 | 3,7 |
UEMOA | 56.6 | 41.6 |
The common bank could fulfil the function of lender of last resort vis-à-vis the national central banks, provided that it had a “banking department” together with the “issuing department”
Let us now see how this model would work in the configuration of the three AES countries where nationalist and anti-colonialist governments have come to power in the last two or three years (Mali/May 2021, Niger/July 2023, and Burkina/September 2022 and possibly Senegal and Chad
Official declarations have been made and publications have appeared in the media which, without being very precise, speak of certain plans for a common currency linked to gold, creation of a common monetary fund or some such intentions. (
The three AES countries are relatively small but very open economies with low nominal GDP measured in dollars
The national monetary architecture will be based on the infrastructure of the existing branches of Banque Centrale des États de l’Afrique de l’Ouest (BCEAO), which will become fully-fledged national central banks
Warehouses should be close to production sites (mines, etc.) and convenient transport hubs. It is desirable to have at least one warehouse in each country. Since the AES countries have no direct access to water, a warehouse should be located in a port of Morocco, whose stated geopolitical strategy is to serve as an outlet for the Sahel countries from the Atlantic, West Africa Free Zone (
The initial balance sheets of the joint bank and the national bank are important. They should be very simple and clear for the general public to understand, particularly the balance sheet of the common bank. In the opening balance sheets of the national banks, it is desirable to minimise the transfer of previous public liabilities, probably move them for amortisation to a separate institution or even cancel them.
The basket must be made up of raw materials and goods that are of strategic and vital importance to the countries in the zone, both in times of peace and in times of crises, such as natural disasters, sanctions, blockade, or war. The AES countries are rich in raw materials, particularly gold and strategic resources (see Table
(i) basic strategic raw materials — gold and oil
(ii) strategic metals and rare earths — manganese, iron, lithium and uranium
(iii) exports of strategic products — cotton, maize, rice and groundnuts
(iv) strategic foods for survival — agricultural products, wheat, etc.
To begin with, we can assume that the weights of the groups are identical, or in some other simplified form. For example :
Option 1: gold (50%); lithium and uranium (25%); cotton and maize (25%)
Option 2: gold (25%); lithium and uranium (25%); cotton and groundnuts (25%); maize and rice (25%)
The initial value or the price of the basket, i.e. of the physical amounts of goods that the notes will cover, can be determined by the following procedure: first, the new regional currency will be defined as
1000 SHL = 500 SHL (expressed in grams of physical gold)
+ 250 SHL (expressed in equal parts in physical amounts: kg. of lithium and lb. of uranium)
+ 250 SHL (also expressed in pounds of cotton and pounds/ton of corn).
In order to set the initial physical amounts of the basket, it is necessary to know the market prices of the raw materials included and to predict their movements in the future based on futures contracts on commodity exchanges. This will enable experts to determine the amounts of the initial stock to be stored, as well as the long-term price of the basket, which will be revised at certain intervals
Mali | Niger | Burkina Faso | |
Strategic commodities | |||
Gold | X | X | X |
Oil | X | ||
Precious and strategic metals | |||
Manganese | X | X | |
Iron | X | X | |
Lithium | X | ||
Uranium | X | X | |
Agricultural raw materials and commodities | |||
Cotton | X | X | X |
Maize | X | X | X |
Rice | X | X | X |
Peanut | X | X | X |
For purely practical reasons, we can assume that 1000 SHL = 1000 USD. In Option 2, for example, if we take the beginning of July 2024 and the price of gold quoted in USD, then 500 USD or 500 SHL represent approximately 7 grams of standard gold. The other components would be defined in the same way. For example, at the beginning of July, USD 250 (or SHL 250) represents 10 kg of lithium and 1.5 lb of uranium
In this market and weight configuration, if, for example, the new system was launched today, the definition in the Regional Banks Act would read roughly as follows:
“The SHL is the new currency of the ESA member countries. The ESA Central Bank undertakes to buy and sell SHL against a basket containing gold, lithium, uranium, cotton and maize, at the following rate (price) and in the following proportions:
1000 SHL = 7 g of gold + 10 kg of lithium + 1.5 lb of uranium + 1.5 lb of cotton + 0.5 t of maize”.
Consequently, every sum of SHL issued is calculated on the basis of the above-mentioned proportions of the physical amounts of the five basic products. For example, for 1 million SHL, documents will have to be filed for the possession of 700 grams of gold + 1 tonne of lithium + 150 pounds of uranium + 150 pounds of cotton + 50 tonnes of maize. Or, for 1 million SHF, the bank will have to provide certificates of access to 700 grams of gold + 1 tonne of lithium + 150 lbs of uranium + 150 lbs of cotton + 50 tonnes of maize. Beneficiaries can then transfer these certificates to their customers via accounting entries, or physically take the goods from the warehouses in order to consume them or use them in production. In exchange for these certificates of property rights, they go to the warehouse and receive the amounts given. In this way, there will always be cover for the issue of the new regional currency.
In addition to the fixed-price exchange rate, the basket will also have a market rate, which will be formed by the price movements of the basket components. Depending on whether the market price deviates upwards or downwards from the fixed price, arbitrageurs will buy, sell, disassemble and reassemble the basket. This will reduce or increase the amount of regional currency accordingly. A minor technical drawback is that these commodities are quoted on international markets mainly in USD and some in CNY (e.g. lithium), and the calculation of the market basket will depend on the exchange rate of the SHL against the USD and CNY
The most logical thing to do is to issue the new currency in banknotes in order to boost public confidence. Banknotes can be issued in denominations of SHL 50, SHL 100, SHL 1,000 and SHL 10,000, i.e. large denominations. With a digital version of the new common currency (CBDC, for example), and in the form of small denominations, it will become a greater threat to the national currency, as it will compete with it in retail payments. The public will have direct access to the new bank’s balance sheet. These are technical details that will need special discussion.
In any case, given the low nominal level of income, the new currency will be used mainly for large payments and for savings and investment. Conversely, the national currency (banknotes and coins) will remain domestic in nature and will circulate on the consumer market. The denominations of the national currency that will have their own name will be placed at a fixed rate of 1:1 to the SHL, in the series 1 SHL, 2 SHL, 5 SHL, 10 SHL and 20 SHL and their names will be chosen at national level. One can imagine the regional currency “SHL AES” and for the national currencies, “SHL Mali; SHL Burkina and the SHL Niger”, with some national symbols on the coins. The difference is that, while the large SHLs will have total coverage of commodities, the national currency will have a minimum coverage of 50% of SHLs and the rest will be made up of government debt securities, advances and refinancing from commercial banks. It is assumed that small-denomination notes of the national currency will not give rise to conversions because the reasons for their demand are essentially transactional. These will probably help in the fight against inflation thanks to the control of issuance.
The initial stage of the project, i.e. the accumulation of the initial stock in the warehouses, needs a delicate touch and is crucial to the success of the whole. It seems best to start with a small basket volume, which will increase as demand for the money grows. As we have pointed out, in order to stabilise demand, it could be announced from the outset that a certain proportion of the taxes of large companies, including those producing the goods in the basket, would have to be paid in new currency. In return for the sums they owe to the budget, that could be in the form of tax anticipations for one or more years, they would have to leave a combination of goods in the official warehouses or they present the certificates to these goods. As mentioned above, the bank will take a commission, based on the difference between the sale rate and the purchase rate, which can be respectively SHL 1050 for the sale and SHL 9950 for the purchase (i.e. +/- 5%). This commission will be used to finance the operation of the system.
With a different approach to stabilising the basket price, and therefore the general price level, it is possible to replicate the system of modern central banks for controlling the interbank rate, e.g. that with the ECB. In this case, it will be possible to organise regular auctions to buy the basket at the official fixed rate; there will be two ceiling rates and limits (deposit and credit) at which economic agents could deposit or receive the basket. In this way, the market rate for the basket would fluctuate within a narrow range around the official rate. The three exchange rate levels, the basket price (deposit, base and credit) will certainly remain constant over long periods of several years.
The debate on the currency in sub-Saharan Africa, in particular on the abandonment of the CFA franc, arouses much concern and a lot of passions. The CFA franc, designed to govern monetary relations of the African countries, mainly the former colonies of France, with the metropolitan country and the rest of the world, is now called into question with the rise of sovereigntist vision in the Confederation of Sahel States. At the same time, some observers think that leaving the current monetary system will harm the countries of the AES Confederation because the CFA franc zone is not only an exchange system, but also an economic cooperation zone: WAEMU for West Africa and CEMAC for Central Africa. For others, however, abandoning the CFA franc could be a lever for the States of the AES Confederation to adopt an autonomous approach to monetary policy, different from the trajectory of the euro zone. Changing the monetary system or leaving the franc zone has never been inevitable. It should be remembered that in 1973 Mauritania and Madagascar left the franc zone to adopt their own system. Well before these two countries, Mali left the franc zone in 1962 to join it again 22 years later. Today, it is a question of the exit of several countries together to adopt a common monetary system based on the natural resources of the AES countries.
In the past, the criticisms levelled against the system mainly concerned technical difficulties and lack of political realism. Today they also involve two other features of the project.
Firstly, despite a few attempts at empirical illustration, the model has rarely been technically simulated, mathematically modelled or programmed
Today, the technical difficulties can be overcome, with information and communication technologies and the processing of large databases making it possible to minimise the model’s transaction costs. In addition, today’s strategic metals, which should become a major component of commodity baskets, are used in the production of cutting-edge technologies in small, high-value physical amounts, i.e. inventory volumes are partially reduced. However, other obstacles remain, such as political and geopolitical aspects.
It is clear that any attempt to introduce changes in the modern architecture and even the philosophy of the current international monetary system by the BRICS or the AES countries will meet with political, ideological and possibly military resistance. The creation of a commodity currency will be seen as part of a geopolitical, monetary and resource war, in which the smaller states and regions will have to seek support and protection from a powerful geopolitical bloc to bring the project to fruition. Failing that, the countries that would initiate such steps could face attempts at destabilisation and then political change. However, it should be clear that, although monetary processes go hand in hand with political processes, the introduction of a sound currency will sooner or later be accepted by the population, and political regimes supported by the population will therefore be difficult to destabilise. The enlargement of the AES to include other countries alongside the three founding members will provide a critical mass to discourage any attacks on the common resource currency project.
The second danger is closely linked to the first. It concerns the problems of system security and the threat of sabotage, speculation and other destructive activities by the major monetary and financial centres. Indeed, the security and insurance of warehouses is of particular importance. We all know how important it is to ensure that gold reserves are safely stored and evacuated in the event of military conflict. As speculation is not to be underestimated, it is not necessary to set a realistic price for the purchase of the basket in the long term, based on expert estimates of the development of demand and the use of the commodities that make up the basket. It is also necessary to establish precise conversion terms to prevent speculative attacks and panics.
Aware of the difficulties, we would like to conclude our article with a summary by the great French economist and translator of Keynes, Jean de Largentaye. Jean de Largentaye makes a prophetic observation about the resource currency project:
“Assuming that fiat money is the real cause of the present disastrous situation, then we must get rid of it as soon as possible. Gold and credit, as monetary standards, must be replaced by an aggregate of storable goods, having a real utility, a utility which is not based mainly or exclusively on their monetary use. I am convinced that a reform of this nature will have to take place one day. One day this order will have to be reformed. But let’s not kid ourselves. It is not as easy as it seems. Apart from the practical difficulties involved, there are powerful interests and deep-rooted prejudices. In truth, there is little chance that it will be achieved in our lifetime. Let us hope, however, that our children, or our grandchildren, will be able to see it come to fruition, and that at last, equipped with a real currency that ensures full employment and price stability, they will rediscover, with classical theory, the intellectual comfort of our youth