
<rss version="0.91">
    <channel>
        <title>Latest Articles from BRICS Journal of Economics</title>
        <description>Latest 8 Articles from BRICS Journal of Economics</description>
        <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 7 Oct 2026 22:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Pensoft FeedCreator</generator>
        
	
		<item>
		    <title>What is the role of financial development and economic growth on energy consumption in the SADC countries? New evidence from the PARDL approach</title>
		    <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/138473/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>BRICS Journal of Economics 7(1): 237-274</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/brics-econ.7.e138473</p>
					<p>Authors: Palesa Lefatsa, Gabila Nubong</p>
					<p>Abstract: This study investigates the interconnections between financial development, economic growth, and energy consumption within the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region between 1980 and 2023. Using the Panel Autoregressive Distributed Lag (PARDL) model alongside Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) causality tests, the research provides new insights into the dynamics of these variables. The study reveals a significant positive correlation between financial development, economic growth, and energy consumption. The key finding is the negative relationship between energy consumption and urbanization, while no significant linkage is found between energy consumption and industrialization. The Granger causality test reveals a unidirectional causal link between financial development, urbanization, and energy consumption, and a bidirectional relationship between economic growth and energy consumption. These findings contribute to existing literature by offering a more nuanced understanding of the region’s energy consumption dynamics compared to previous studies that have often presented inconclusive or context-specific results. This study extends previous research by examining the unique economic and energy challenges faced by the SADC countries, providing fresh evidence for policymakers focused on integrating financial sector development with sustainable energy policies. The study suggests that investing in renewable energy and expanding electricity access, especially in rural areas, could enhance both urbanization and financial sector growth, fostering broader economic development. The diagnostic checks affirm the robustness and reliability of the model, ensuring the validity of the findings.</p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/138473/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/138473/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/138473/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Analyzing Integration of BRIC into GVCs: A Value-Added Trade Perspective</title>
		    <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/154692/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>BRICS Journal of Economics 6(4): 61-85</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/brics-econ.6.e154692</p>
					<p>Authors: José Firmino de Sousa Filho, Gervásio Ferreira dos Santos, Luiz Carlos de Santana Ribeiro, Rodrigo Barbosa de Cerqueira</p>
					<p>Abstract: This paper examines the involvement of Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) in the global value chains (GVCs) between 2000 and 2014. It focuses on domestic value-added exports and vertical specialization. We use WIOD tables to assess the position of these countries in GVCs and a decomposition of their trade in terms of value added. China exhibits substantial growth in all indicators, whereas the other countries’ results appear to be mixed. The study also considers the economies of Mexico and South Korea, highlighting Mexico’s declining participation in GVCs in contrast to the steady growth of South Korea’s involvement. To ensure sustained long-term economic growth, the BRICS countries and other emerging economies should create a common growth agenda and increase their participation in global value chains. The paper provides insights into the dynamics of trade and vertical specialization and thus contributes to better understanding of economic relations between the BRICS countries and other emerging economies.</p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/154692/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/154692/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/154692/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Mon, 8 Dec 2025 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Assessing the impossible trinity principle in BRICS grouping</title>
		    <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/146580/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>BRICS Journal of Economics 6(4): 5-16</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/brics-econ.6.e146580</p>
					<p>Authors: Lumengo Bonga-Bonga</p>
					<p>Abstract: This paper contributes to the literature on the policy trilemma by evaluating potential policy combinations for the original BRICS within the framework of the Impossible Trinity. It also introduces a novel modelling approach that defines a boundary for the linear combination of variables associated with the policy trilemma. The findings reveal that the trilemma emerges from the interplay of these three policy dimensions. Given the global influence of the BRICS countries, the results suggest that, if they maintain a fixed exchange rate system, they will likely have to sacrifice either free capital movement or independence from monetary policy. This loss of flexibility could be particularly detrimental, considering their significant international influence and their role as major recipients of capital flows for trade and financial transactions. Consequently, the optimal policy combination for BRICS is free capital flow, monetary independence, and a flexible exchange rate.</p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/146580/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/146580/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/146580/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 06:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Sectoral systems of innovation in two BRICS countries: A case of the clothing, textile, leather, and footwear sector of South Africa and Brazil</title>
		    <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/141289/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>BRICS Journal of Economics 6(2): 117-138</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/brics-econ.6.e141289</p>
					<p>Authors: Sipho Mbatha</p>
					<p>Abstract: Clothing, textiles, leather, and footwear (CTLF) sector of South Africa has been a priority sector for the government for almost two decades. However, the CTLF sector has not been able to achieve the reindustrialisation levels envisaged by the government and other stakeholders. It is therefore necessary to explore the possibilities of gaining competitive advantage and also understand the challenges facing the sectoral systems of innovation that impede the development of the CTLF sector in South Africa. Through the triple helix theory of innovation and Porter’s diamond model of competitive advantage, this review paper looks at the CTLF sectors of two BRICS nations, Brazil and South Africa, in an attempt to determine the factors that could jump-start the competitive development of the South African CTLF sector. This paper outlines proposals for improving the sectoral systems of innovation in South Africa’s CTLF industry, which should help it gain competitive advantage. It also makes a scholarly contribution to designing strategies that could be used to enhance collaboration among the BRICS nations.</p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/141289/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/141289/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/141289/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Theoretical analysis of sharing economy factors in Russia and Brazil</title>
		    <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/145277/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>BRICS Journal of Economics 6(1): 209-222</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/brics-econ.6.e145277</p>
					<p>Authors: Diana Mikhajlenko, Natalia Kononkova</p>
					<p>Abstract: This paper examines the sharing economy as an advanced model of interaction between economic agents that helps them mitigate resource constraints and rapidly meet producers’ and consumers’ needs in the face of new challenges. We found the benefits of collaborative consumption, or sharing, to be largely determined by the level of trust in society, development of technological base and adaptation of legal framework to digital transformation of the national economy. Based on the evidence from Russia and Brazil, we classify the factors that determine the sharing economy development and identify effective instruments of regulating sharing relations. The results indicate that regulatory “sandboxes” appear to be most appropriate as they allow participants to test innovations of substantial public importance that lie outside the scope of existing legislative norms.</p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/145277/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/145277/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/145277/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Wed, 2 Apr 2025 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Global Economic Integration: How do ASEAN and BRICS organizations contribute to the process?</title>
		    <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/121010/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>BRICS Journal of Economics 5(2): 155-168</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/brics-econ.5.e121010</p>
					<p>Authors: Sanela Porca-Konjikusic, Paul L. Hudson Jr., Lodha Jain Harshi</p>
					<p>Abstract: This paper explores the realms of global economic integration by comparing the two prominent international organizations: the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Brazil, Russia, India, China, and the South Africa bloc (BRICS) and new entrants to BRICS Plus. The study examines the shared objectives, divergent approaches, and potential complementarity of these organizations. By analyzing their economic diversity, regional and global initiatives, and trade agreements, the research investigates the question of collaboration between BRICS and ASEAN organizations. This research finds a variety of economic disparities among members of both ASEAN and BRICS, a variety of investment patterns, economic policies, population and labor force dynamics, net portfolio investments, and capital flows. The paper provides a nuanced holistic analysis of ASEAN and BRICS. This article offers a unique, holistic analysis, comparing and contrasting ASEAN and BRICS countries and the nature of these two organizations. This paper includes policy recommendations related to fostering collaboration between nations in various aspects of their economies, and areas in which countries may strengthen financial ties. Knowledge of BRICS, BRICS Plus, and ASEAN gained through reading this article may enable them to decide on strategies to avoid trade barriers and may also enable them to identify countries with growth areas in various economic sectors.</p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/121010/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/121010/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/121010/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Voluntary insurance for rapid growth digital banking: Seeking attentions for policy-design in Pakistan-economy</title>
		    <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/121606/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>BRICS Journal of Economics 5(1): 35-52</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/brics-econ.5.e121606</p>
					<p>Authors: Akim M. Rahman, Lavina Maureen Zaman</p>
					<p>Abstract: In today’s business-driven world, e-banking service is an important product in financial sectors of many countries and Pakistan is no exception. Many affect the delivery of these services, often unpredictable, factors and are fraught with serious pitfalls including those of psychological nature. The Voluntary Insurance scheme can help the country overcome existing difficulties and move closer to a cashless society, contributing to the growth of the banking sector and safety of the e-banking operations in Pakistan. The new e-banking legal products are expected to gratify consumers, make the banks stronger, and contribute to the overall social development; the proposed Voluntary Insurance is to guarantee their success. The Welfare Analyses have been used for setting the VI prices so that the customers’ efficiency-cost balance could become appealing. Once the policymakers and policy practitioners of Pakistan recognize the importance of the proposed VI product and make the necessary arrangements for its use in the e-banking services market, it may spread from bankers to their customers and thus over the whole economy. The process of life cycle of the VI product will follow the “S-curve” in progression. These developments will become drivers of economic growth and e-services will eventually replace traditional banking.</p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/121606/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/121606/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/121606/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Return of Coal: A Short Visit or a Long Stay?</title>
		    <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/94712/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>BRICS Journal of Economics 3(4): 209-229</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/brics-econ.3.e94712</p>
					<p>Authors: Dzhanneta Medzhidova</p>
					<p>Abstract: Despite the existence of global targets to slow the pace of climate change, coal remains one of the most commonly used fuels that accounts for over 25% of the global energy supply and consumption. Multiple factors explain why coal is still widely used: its relatively low prices, availability in developing countries, low transportation costs and path dependence, i.e. the existing energy infrastructure. Coal consumption in developing (non-OECD) countries has been rising thanks to the processes in India and China but in 2021, however, it increased in the OECD countries as well. The uneven and often atypical post-COVID-19 recovery driven by manufacturing created disruptions in energy markets with high and volatile prices of coal’s main substitute - natural gas. The first in history and hence unexpected slowdown in the RES supply in 2021 added to the reversal of trends exactly at the time of the COP26 in Glasgow.        The goal of our study is to examine the coal markets in the new complex environment determined by both economic and political factors: high commodity prices, rising inflation, decelerating economic growth, and sanctions against exporters. In this paper we analyze the major trends before 2020, the current processes, and their implications for the future in the context of choice between economic development and energy transition including the issue of stranded assets and their possible reopening.</p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/94712/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/94712/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/94712/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 11:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>
	