
<rss version="0.91">
    <channel>
        <title>Latest Articles from BRICS Journal of Economics</title>
        <description>Latest 4 Articles from BRICS Journal of Economics</description>
        <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 23:28:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Pensoft FeedCreator</generator>
        
	
		<item>
		    <title>Quantile Evidence on Institutional Quality and Economic Growth in a Fragile State: The Case of Afghanistan</title>
		    <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/170868/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>BRICS Journal of Economics 7(1): 49-84</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/brics-econ.7.e170868</p>
					<p>Authors: Yang Jingjing, Shah Mir Mowahed, Mariam Reha</p>
					<p>Abstract: In recent decades, the role of institutions has become a central topic of discussion among scholars and policy makers. This study used time-series data from Afghanistan between 1996 and 2024 to gain new insights into the impact of political instability (POI), corruption (COR) and government effectiveness (GEF) on economic growth. The results of Quantile-on-Quantile Regression and Wavelet Quantile regression reveal that POI, COR, and GEF have adverse and statistically significant effects on GDP growth across all quantiles and over long-term time periods. Event analysis through the interrupted time series technique shows that the key political events, including the Civil War (CW), the First Round of the Taliban Regime (FRTR), U.S.-NATO interventions (USN), the Second Round of Taliban Regime (SRTR), and Regime Changes (RCH), have had a negative impact on Afghanistan’s GDP growth. The immediate impact of the Soviet Union’s war is estimated to be positive. At the same time, Afghanistan’s GDP experienced negative growth during SUW, CW, FRTR, and RCH, while during USN and SRTR, the GDP growth was positive. Based on these findings, the paper discusses possible policy implications.</p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/170868/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/170868/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/170868/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 6 Mar 2026 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Tobin-Q Valuation Methodology of the Impact of Corporate Governance Structure on Organizational Performance: Evidence from Nigeria’s Banking Sector</title>
		    <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/134961/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>BRICS Journal of Economics 6(1): 35-52</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/brics-econ.6.e134961</p>
					<p>Authors: Ayodeji Ajibola</p>
					<p>Abstract: The paper investigates the relationship between corporate governance and organizational performance in Nigeria’s banking sector between 1996 and 2023, using the Tobin-Q valuation and operating performance methodology (quantitative characteristics) of variables in analyzing data collected from secondary sources.     The internal mechanisms of corporate governance such as Returns on Assets (ROA), shareholder profit and Debt-Equity ratio had a negative impact on organizational performance. The study into forecast and long-term co-integration relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and organizational performance has shown that the enhancement of organizational performance by corporate governance mechanisms is likely to experience a steady increase after 2023.</p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/134961/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/134961/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/134961/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Wed, 2 Apr 2025 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Political Economy of STI in China: Analyzing Official Discourse on Science, Technology and Innovation-Driven Development in the Contemporary China</title>
		    <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/120897/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>BRICS Journal of Economics 5(2): 131-154</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/brics-econ.5.e120897</p>
					<p>Authors: Kumar Akhilesh</p>
					<p>Abstract: Science, technology, and Innovation (STI) have been the cornerstone of China’s Reform and Opening-up processes. Employing a hybrid methodology, including textual analysis, this paper asserts that four decades of reform and opening-up have witnessed STI’s pivotal role across sectors despite numerous challengesб such as economic slowdown, growing disparities, environmental issues, and a huge burden on the state-owned enterprises. China’s substantial investments in the Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies, including Artificial Intelligence and New Energy Vehicles, exemplify its commitment to innovation, reflected in over 2.5% of GDP allocated for research and development in 2022. This robust investment has bolstered China’s innovative capabilities and brought about its high ranking on the Global Innovation Index. In Chinese STI politics and policy-making, the programs like MLP-2006, SEI-2010 and Made in China 2025 have created a watershed moment. Three central research questions guide our exploration: the trajectory of policy framing on STI-Driven development, the theoretical underpinnings of Innovation-Driven Development and Green Development in Chinese STI politics, and the significance of these paradigms in China’s context. This paper also hypothesizes the emergence of two distinct trajectories within China’s STI politics through the adoption of Innovation-Driven Development and Green Development, positioning STI at the core of China’s development paradigm. The study thoroughly dissects China’s official discourse, framing these paradigms within the Sustainable Development context and highlighting their crucial roles in China’s journey toward technological advancement and sustainability. The analysis of the evolution of China’s STI policy as portrayed in official discourse offers insights into the strategic role played by science, technology, and Innovation in moulding China’s socio-economic trajectory alongside global implications stemming from its transformative development agenda.</p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/120897/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/120897/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/120897/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Impact of Financial Inclusion on Human Development Index: Special Reference to BRICS Countries</title>
		    <link>https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/96288/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>BRICS Journal of Economics 4(2): 209-223</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.3897/brics-econ.4.e96288</p>
					<p>Authors: Thakur Dev Pandey</p>
					<p>Abstract: The BRICS countries are frequently referred to as “emerging economies”; they account for a sizable proportion of the global population and face issues such as poverty, income inequality, slow economic growth, gender inequality, and high unemployment rates. Policy measures are currently being considered and implemented in response to these difficulties. Previous studies suggest that greater financial inclusion has a positive effect on such countries’ development, hence its importance as a tool used to deal with the socioeconomic challenges faced by emerging economies. When we talk about “financial inclusion,” we are referring to the ease with which people can access and make use of basic financial services, such as savings accounts, credit cards, and insurance. In this paper, we use data from the Global Findex Database and the World Bank Database to create the Financial Inclusion (Finclusion) Index, which provides a comparative measure of financial access for different nations. The primary purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effect of financial inclusion on HDI in 105 countries; per capita income and gender development are also compared across BRICS countries. The study found that financial inclusion had a significant impact on human development in general and a positive effect on the development of women in particular. The result is valid for the BRICS countries, where financial inclusion has considerably boosted human development and is positively correlated with women empowerment.</p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/96288/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/96288/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://brics-econ.arphahub.com/article/96288/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>
	